| Author |
Message |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 08/03/2010 22:27:05
|
Eve
Joined: 08/03/2010 22:22:17
Messages: 2
Location: Moscow
Offline
|
Hi, I am not quite sure I'm doing it in a right topic, yet...
I would REALLY like to see an improvement to the Nonogram puzzle. Actually, maybe even 2.
1) A bolder line every five squares on the grid - similar to all paper variants and all electronic variant ever seen by me. It would make it a lot easier to find yourself around the grid.
2) Maybe a feature that will allow the player to cross out the numbers that are already marked on the grid, so that we won't have to double- and triplecheck every number.
Thanks a lot for all the great puzzles!
|
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 17/03/2010 00:22:05
|
Johan
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar/eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3.jpg)
Joined: 22/12/2006 20:08:51
Messages: 632
Online
|
Both suggestions might be possible, but they require some work to have the existing puzzles adjusted. I can not promise these changes will be made, but they might be, so suppose they will be, how would you deal with a puzzle having a width of 16? Would that become 3x5+1 or 4x4? What about 17?
|
------------------------------------
Facebookers, join our group!  |
|
|
 |
![[Post New]](/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif) 26/03/2010 14:56:15
|
Eve
Joined: 08/03/2010 22:22:17
Messages: 2
Location: Moscow
Offline
|
Thanks for your reply!
I guess the grid should always be divided into 5*5 squares - that is a nice convinient number, and it wouldn't create any confusion. And, as far as I know, that is the case on other puzzle resources and in many puzzle books. I don't think that having an extra couple of squares in a 17*17 puzzle will confuse anyone.
Again thaks for considering my suggestion.
|
|
|
 |
|
|