Forums

I wanted to ask about the note in the Archipelago example. It says that bridges that can be drawn between Islands but can not be crossed by any other possible bridge must be part of the solution because of uniqueness? I do not understand this, as the rules indicate that due to the Shamans lack of wealth the solution must be the one with the minimal number of bridges? Adding extra bridges contradicts the minimal numbwe of bridgews rule and thus does not violate uniwuness? Am I missing sum-thing?

As far as I remember, there is no requirement that the number of bridges should be minimal, just that all islands need to be connected.

Hmm... interesting. Now that I look at the rules, I see there is indeed a sentence about shamans that aren't known for their wealth. This sentence only appears in the English rules though, not in the Dutch ones. I wonder if one of those has been rewritten without the other being made consistent at some point...

Alright, we have decided to remove the unjust insinuation that shamans are in general not wealthy. We hope this resolves any confusion there may have been.

I hope the shmans now will thrive in the archipelagos and accumulate wealth (Now that it is legitimate). Thanks for clearing up the issue. I use your suggestion of filling up the areas that can not be crossed a lot, it will be a much more difficult genere if I did not have this starting point.